ICS Media Database

WEST PALM BEACH — An electrical subcontractor has to pay a company more than $200,000 after it was found in breach of a contract by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, according to a May 4 opinion.

MWH Constructors Inc. sued Brown and Brown Electric Inc. for breach of contract and contractual indemnification, and B&B filed a breach of contract counterclaim.

B&B and MWH had partnered after Palm Beach County Water Utilities Department hired MWH to complete a project for $13.8 million. MWH then hired B&B as its electrician via a subcontract for $1.4 million.

MWH found B&B was in default of the contract after it was unable to complete the work in the agreed-upon timeframe and sent B&B a notice to inform the company that it was behind schedule, according to information in the ruling. MWH then hired a second electrical company, Curry Controls Co. to finish the work B&B could not. Curry Controls completed the remaining work.

The District Court stated B&B did keep the terms of its subcontract agreement with MWH. The court pointed out details agreed upon in the subcontract were enough to prove B&B breached the contract and said it should have given MWH proper notice if it could not comply with the terms of the subcontract. B&B did not provide any proof it notified MWH that it could not reach the terms of the subcontract, the ruling notes. Considering this, the court stated, “B&B waived any right it may have to enforce its legitimate contractual right” and MWH was “entitled” to submit the notice of default.

Although B&B made claims that MWH breached the subcontract when it failed to pay B&B, the District Court stated MWH was right to not provide payments since B&B violated the subcontract.

The District Court also found B&B liable for the breach of contract because it did not indemnify MWH “for its damages, losses, costs and expenses arising from B&B’s failure to timely perform its work,” according to the opinion.

The court also concluded B&B still owes MWH $289,267.53 after calculating the amount B&B paid the new subcontractor, Curry Controls, including a 15 percent markup, as well as the amount MWH paid B&B’s lower-tier subcontractors and suppliers.

The court denied B&B’s counterclaim.

Want to get notified whenever we write about U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division ?
Next time we write about U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division




More News