TALLAHASSEE – A Florida Supreme Court ruling allowing mortgage lenders to resume suspended foreclosure proceedings at any time likely will mean an increase in foreclosure filings, according to three mortgage experts, who also agree the ruling provides much-needed clarity and consistency to lenders.  

Before the ruling made in the case of Bartram v. U.S. Bank, Florida law required mortgage lenders to wait five years after a default before they could begin new a new foreclosure. However, the state’s high court ruled that the default status resets each month that an outstanding balance remains.


U.S. Bank’s foreclosure process on Lewis Bartram’s $650,000 home in Ponte Vedra Beach stalled because the bank’s law firm closed. As a result, the foreclosure case was dismissed in 2011, five years after the proceedings began, because the previous statute of limitations had expired.


However, Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal overturned the dismissal. Bartram then appealed the matter to the Florida Supreme Court.


“The Florida Supreme Court’s decision finally brings some clarity to the issue and will allow judges who have been reluctant to rule on foreclosure cases to move forward with ones that have been pending for years,” Michele Stocker, co-chair of the Greenberg Traurig Consumer Financial Services Litigation Practice, told the Florida Record. “Now everyone knows what is and isn’t permissible.”


Stocker said a decline in foreclosure filings resulted from of a number of different factors, including a better economy and more loss mitigation efforts by banks to help homeowners avoid foreclosure. However, she said the Bartram decision will likely prompt an increase in filings.


“I do not think the increase will be that significant since the banks will continue to offer loss mitigation options to their customers,” Stocker said. “The bank’s efforts, coupled with the improving economy, will continue to limit the number of new filings.”


Renee Marie Smith, a Florida real estate attorney and distressed housing industry specialist, agreed that the number of residential mortgage foreclosures will likely increase in the near future, as lenders will rely on the Bartram decision to restart foreclosures on old mortgage delinquencies that were on hold because of the conflict of ruling in the Florida court system.


Smith also agreed with the court’s ruling.


“It is vital to eliminate inconsistency in the courts so that we can clear out the backlog of delinquent mortgages and have a stable lending environment in Florida,” Smith told the Florida Record.


In addition, she said the ruling puts all parties “back to square one” upon dismissal without prejudice to either the borrower or the lender.


“Borrowers, in my opinion, retain the same defenses and rights as before,” Smith said. “[They] just don’t have a free pass to non-repayment.”


Smith said the ruling helps lenders because it eliminates uncertainty regarding how to collect on delinquencies, which will decrease lending costs.


Greenspoon Marder, PA shareholder Dariel Abrahamy said he agrees with the ruling because mortgage lenders should not be prohibited from filing a new foreclosure action simply because the prior foreclosure was dismissed.


“In my opinion it would be inequitable for someone who does not pay their mortgage for years to get a house for free simply because a foreclosure action was previously dismissed,” Abrahamy told the Florida Record. “Borrowers who thought they would be able to avoid their mortgage payments indefinitely without any repercussions should be prepared to have the banks start new foreclosure actions against them.”


Abrahamy said the opinion from the Florida Supreme Court provides confirmation that mortgage lenders are able to file new foreclosure actions against borrowers who are in default.


“We can expect an increase in the amount of foreclosure filing in the short term as lenders have been waiting for this decision to provide clarity on the statute of limitations issue,” he said.


Also, Abrahamy said, lenders should carefully review their loan documents before they file a new foreclosure on a previously accelerated loan. He said the court determined that in order to permit reinstatement after acceleration, the mortgage documents must include language permitting reinstatement, and not every mortgage includes that language.

Want to get notified whenever we write about Florida Supreme Court ?
Next time we write about Florida Supreme Court, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Florida Supreme Court

More News