Allowing for the postponement means that a trial team can remain in place for the duration of the case, providing the client with a continuation of representation. The potential for postponement also would mean that a firm could not use a pregnant (or even potential pregnant) attorney as a means of excluding female lawyers from a case.
There is concern about the effect such a policy would have in allowing a judge to efficiently maneuver through a case, as well as the effect a postponement would have on the other cases they were overseeing.
While the need for such a leave of absence in regards to childbirth is at the heart of the discussion, not far behind it are similar life-changing events, such as adoption and parental leave.
While this rule continues to be debated, Florida's judges are using personal discretion to postpone or keep moving cases forward when presented with a pregnant attorney.
“It’s hard to make a decision right now, because we don’t know exactly what the rule will cover,"
Leora B. Freire, president of the Florida Association for Women Lawyers (FAWL) told The Florida Record. "There have been various discussions of how it would affect larger firms, smaller firms, men and women."
Freire said the uncertainty has put organizations such as FAWL in limbo.
“FAWL has not yet officially taken a position (on the rule), because it did not come directly out of committee, so we need to wait and see what happens in order to make a decision on what to recommend to our members," she said.